<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firestorm in the Arctic: Al Gore Vindicated on Comments in Copenhagen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogontheuniverse.org/2009/12/16/firestorm-in-the-arctic-al-gore-vindicated-on-comments-in-copenhagen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogontheuniverse.org/2009/12/16/firestorm-in-the-arctic-al-gore-vindicated-on-comments-in-copenhagen/</link>
	<description>getting anyone emotional about science, helping parents and teachers make science an adventure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 03:54:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Brooks</title>
		<link>http://blogontheuniverse.org/2009/12/16/firestorm-in-the-arctic-al-gore-vindicated-on-comments-in-copenhagen/comment-page-1/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 23:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogontheuniverse.org/?p=6561#comment-383</guid>
		<description>I missed this post first time round,

Perhaps it&#039;s just me, but isn&#039;t this the whole problem with the AGW &quot;debate&quot; - people don&#039;t do the research, and make statements that they cannot back up.

Then when their error is pointed out to them they either dismiss it out of hand or choose the &quot;well I don&#039;t trust scientists to do science&quot; route - maybe the politics should be removed from the equation and we should just do right by the planet as indicated by the scientific consensus, whether we are the &quot;first cause&quot; or not.

I must say that I am heavily disappointed that such a high-standard UK Newspaper as The Times should be employing people to report science who cannot perform the basics of research so integral to what they are reporting.

Ben Brooks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I missed this post first time round,</p>
<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s just me, but isn&#8217;t this the whole problem with the AGW &#8220;debate&#8221; &#8211; people don&#8217;t do the research, and make statements that they cannot back up.</p>
<p>Then when their error is pointed out to them they either dismiss it out of hand or choose the &#8220;well I don&#8217;t trust scientists to do science&#8221; route &#8211; maybe the politics should be removed from the equation and we should just do right by the planet as indicated by the scientific consensus, whether we are the &#8220;first cause&#8221; or not.</p>
<p>I must say that I am heavily disappointed that such a high-standard UK Newspaper as The Times should be employing people to report science who cannot perform the basics of research so integral to what they are reporting.</p>
<p>Ben Brooks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars Fischer</title>
		<link>http://blogontheuniverse.org/2009/12/16/firestorm-in-the-arctic-al-gore-vindicated-on-comments-in-copenhagen/comment-page-1/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars Fischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogontheuniverse.org/?p=6561#comment-367</guid>
		<description>The thing about this is that news organisations and journalists are in dire need of money. Coincidentially, a lot of money is currently spent to get the message out that climate science is &quot;dodgy&quot;. Connect the dots...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing about this is that news organisations and journalists are in dire need of money. Coincidentially, a lot of money is currently spent to get the message out that climate science is &#8220;dodgy&#8221;. Connect the dots&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Bauer</title>
		<link>http://blogontheuniverse.org/2009/12/16/firestorm-in-the-arctic-al-gore-vindicated-on-comments-in-copenhagen/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Bauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogontheuniverse.org/?p=6561#comment-365</guid>
		<description>Many Thanks for that Excellent summary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many Thanks for that Excellent summary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MIke</title>
		<link>http://blogontheuniverse.org/2009/12/16/firestorm-in-the-arctic-al-gore-vindicated-on-comments-in-copenhagen/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>MIke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogontheuniverse.org/?p=6561#comment-363</guid>
		<description>Yes, the &#039;journalist&#039; is an endangered species.  But  maybe they were not up-to-it, many having stood for hours in the Copenhagen cold.  I am sure the change from Bali was a shock.

I saw this correction first on Climate Depot. 

Did you also do a teachable moment when Gore said that the earth&#039;s core was &#039;several million degrees&#039;?  Seems the main stream press gave him a pass on that one. 

Did you utilize the teachable moment when the British Judge ruled that Gore&#039;s film could not be shown in schools there without corrections of many of the errors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the &#8216;journalist&#8217; is an endangered species.  But  maybe they were not up-to-it, many having stood for hours in the Copenhagen cold.  I am sure the change from Bali was a shock.</p>
<p>I saw this correction first on Climate Depot. </p>
<p>Did you also do a teachable moment when Gore said that the earth&#8217;s core was &#8216;several million degrees&#8217;?  Seems the main stream press gave him a pass on that one. </p>
<p>Did you utilize the teachable moment when the British Judge ruled that Gore&#8217;s film could not be shown in schools there without corrections of many of the errors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

